Not As Many Hallows About, This Last Eve

Photo by Courtney Mroch

Looks like I’ve survived another Halloween. This was a quiet one compared to previous years. Maybe because it rained all day (though it was clear at night), or maybe because it fell on a Monday. Whatever the cause, though I enjoyed seeing the little kids in their costumes–especially the polite ones!–I kind of appreciated the slowness this year.

This used to be my wife’s favorite holiday, and some of her enthusiasm rubbed off onto me over the years. Lately, though, our workload keeps us from getting creative with creepy decorations and such, I’m not a big fan of wearing costumes myself, and some of the charmers coming to our door have been less than charming. Some of the luster has worn off of this holiday for me, and for my wife as well, I’m afraid.

There’s a house a couple miles up the road that really goes all out and does an amazing job. They turn their house into a pirate ship manned by skeletons, and you really have to look hard to confirm that there’s a house under all that wood and smoke. I kind of suspect some of their neighbors are less than crazy about the display–especially given the time it takes to set it up and strike it down again–but I think it’s pretty awesome. That’s Halloween done right–get really into it, go hog wild, and outdo yourself every year. I wish I had that kind of Halloween spirit, but I just don’t.

My town usually has a lot of trick-or-treaters, but whether that’s a good or bad thing is a bit more nuanced than it might appear on the surface. It’s not just a sign of how enthusiastic people around here are, but of the fact that people from other parts of the county drive their kids miles away from home to have them trick-or-treat at our houses.

I guess the perception is that we give better candy, or maybe some people just want an excuse to walk up to some of the bigger houses in town (not mine!) and gawk. It’s fair to say that our median income is above that of the surrounding neighborhoods, and it’s also fair to say that a greater percentage of our houses are participating. But, you know, if all these people were home manning their own doors instead of driving to our neighborhood, then a greater percentage of the houses in their neighborhood would be participating as well.

I’m not quite sure how I feel about this. It’s kind of a compliment, I suppose–except when I walk behind someone from out of town talking about how stupid people around here are to waste money on those little electric cars.

There’s also the idea that, as long as we’re sticking to our own neighborhoods, then it’s kind of like we all chip in to communally buy candy for all our kids. Some candy goes out the door, some candy comes in the door, and we’re all a part of it. But if you bring your kids over here, and your house is a half-dozen miles away, then what exactly are you contributing?

On the other hand, if we can provide for some little kid an experience she could not have in her own neighborhood, then part of me is happy to be able to do that. Heck, it’s only some candy, for cripes’ sake. One of the things I’ve always liked about this town is that our kids do get to have some of the experiences that were common when I was a kid, that seem less common now. The experiences of an active community where people still do things like get to know their neighbors and take part in the holidays. I want my kids to grow up with those memories, and I wouldn’t deny them to some other kids.

Some of the parents of those kids, though, who come around without a please or a thank you, and expecting candy for themselves even though they aren’t in costume, or expecting candy for their infant who is too young to eat candy, are another story altogether.

And I really can’t wrap my head around who thought it was a good idea last year to start running a bus service to shuttle out-of-town trick-or-treaters to all the different parts of town. Seriously?! I wonder who’s paying for that service, and hope it isn’t me.

I can imagine an argument where that makes sense–people are going to come anyway, this disperses some of the congestion away from the center of town, and this reduces the number of cars on the street. I get all that, but if we’re going to go all out and become a holiday attraction for outsiders, then shouldn’t we be seeing some benefit for it? The Chamber of Commerce puts on all sorts of cool events downtown like the falling leaves and the snowfall and fireworks, but those businesses see increased revenue from all the outside traffic. What benefit do I get?

It seem wrong, somehow, to be an unwitting tourist attraction.

Maybe I’m turning into the Halloween equivalent of The Grinch.

Posted in rants | 2 Comments

Hey, Thanks for the Candy

I had a bit of a . . . complex reaction to receiving some candy from an anonymous colleague. I wanted to express how I felt about it, because, Hey! That’s what I do! But school didn’t seem to be the right place to go into it, and neither did facebook. And then I thought, Ah hah! I have a blog! This is what blogs are for! . . . Except that the general readership I’m trying to attract probably wouldn’t be interested in my blargy thoughts on this, so that’s why it’s password protected. If you know me well and really want to know, the password is the last name of the school director when I was first hired to teach in this town.

Posted in blargety-blog, teaching | Leave a comment

Protected: Hey, Thanks for the Candy

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Posted in blargety-blog, teaching | Enter your password to view comments.

Cruisin’

Note: This post was originally supposed to go up on August 10th, right after my family and I got back from our cruise to Mexico, but seems to have gotten lost in the ether. Still, I thought, no reason not to go ahead and post it now. Maybe it will put you back in a summery frame of mind . . .

Photo by Paul Beattie, CC BY-ND 2.0

In which I give all manner of free advertising to Carnival Cruise Lines . . .

I swore to myself I was gonna make this trip invisible to the blog, by lining up saved posts ahead of time, but in the end one lonely post, posted the day after I intended, was all I could manage.† Now I’ve got less than a week to accomplish a million things that really need to get done before the next school year begins.

I wasn’t always such a fan of cruising. That was more Lisa’s thing, while I loved nothing more than a good road trip. The thing is, a good road trip is more of a young dude’s thing–before kids in the backseat, before setting up the DVD player (and before said DVD player arrived on the scene, forcing me to leave the stereo off), before carsick passengers, and before having to have every detail in the itinerary planned.

Maybe some day the freewheeling road trips of my youth will be possible again, but for now I’ve learned to enjoy the perks of a good cruise: tons of activities for every member of the family, most of the major expenses taken care of up front, getting there is more than half the fun (you rarely hear “are we there yet?”), and you unpack only once while your hotel room moves with you.

A lot of folks in this town hear me mention cruises and immediately start talking Disney Cruise Line, but I’m actually not a fan. My wife and I have cruised with Carnival, Norwegian, Disney, and this little rinky-dink outfit out of Fort Lauderdale, and the one we keep coming back to is Carnival. My biggest complaint with Disney is that there frankly wasn’t very much to do. I guess a lot of people like to sit on the pool deck all day relaxing, reading, drinking, and so forth. On Disney, all the activities are pretty much in the evening, and often they are scheduled to conflict with their (excellent) theater shows. Their much-vaunted “adult entertainment district” is, in my experience, usually completely dead.

On Carnival, the party never seems to stop, from well before I get up in the morning until I pass out early the next morning. And it doesn’t hurt that Carnival costs like half as much as Disney does.

This cruise managed to exceed my already high expectations in a number of ways. There were a lot of little things I appreciated, like their new open dining time plan, the way several of their bar servers seemed to learn my name after just one evening, and even the magician doing card tricks from table to table during dinner time. They also had even more of my favorite activities than I’d come to expect. I didn’t see comment cards in the usual pile of debarkation paperwork, and that’s too bad, because I would have had extremely positive things to say about the Inspiration and her crew.

I mentioned a few weeks ago that one of my favorite things about cruises–apart from getting to explore foreign ports of call–was karaoke. This trip didn’t disappoint in that regard, and I got to add a couple of new songs to my repertoire: Colin Raye’s “That’s My Story” and Sammy Kershaw’s “She Don’t Know She’s Beautiful.” I also gave the best rendition I’ve given of David Lee Roth’s “Just A Gigolo”–I may not quite have mastered the scat part of the song yet, but I muddled my way through pretty dang decently.

As last blasts go, this was a pretty decent way to close out a summer. 😎

† i.e., Friday, which is quickly shaping up to be this site’s black hole in terms of traffic.

Posted in blargety-blog | Leave a comment

Goals and Tide-Me-Over-Goals: Examples from the Pros (Part 2)

In a previous post, I stated my belief that characters are pretty much only interesting if they’re trying to accomplish something. It’s incredibly common, in an unpublished manuscript, to get a good long look at a character’s life before—before everything changes, before they meet that interesting person, before tragedy strikes, before they find their passion. Nothing wrong with that, but it’s also incredibly common for that character to pretty much just bounce around while stuff happens around them, going where they’re told, doing a lot of emoting, but pretty much not trying to have an effect on their lives or on the world around them. I maintain that it’s hard to get interested in a character who is just observing the world. Interesting characters are movers and shakers. Even when they’re unhappy or unsuccessful, they’re trying to do something. If not, why the heck would we want to spend six to eight hours with them?

In order to fully convince you that I’m not pulling stuff out of my ear with this emphasis on character goals, I’m going to look through a random assortment of popular books and show that this is a technique that’s extremely common and effective in successful, published novels. Wherever possible, I’ll link to the Google Books preview of the book or to the Amazon page if there’s a Look Inside feature, so you can read the opening pages for yourself if you’re so inclined. Hopefully the links will work. If you’re not buying my argument yet, then go and see for yourself.

Incidentally, I’m also pointing you in the direction of some pretty good YA and MG books. If your interest in the book gets piqued and you want to buy a copy, the photo will be a link to Powell’s.

So without further ado, here we go:

Uglies, by Scott Westerfeld

Uglies begins with about half a page of sarcastic, teen-voicey description of an ugly sky. And then immediately, while we’re still on the first page, we have a protagonist with a goal. Tally Youngblood is waiting for darkness, pretending to go to sleep, and planning . . . something. We don’t know what it is yet, but it doesn’t matter. Within one page we know that Tally is someone who acts. Is she an unhappy teen? Yes—her best friend has moved on to New Pretty Town but she has not yet—but she’s not listlessly drifting from event to event. “Maybe this was a stupid plan, but anything was better than . . . feeling sorry for herself.” Indeed. As we keep reading, we learn that her immediate goal is to sneak over to New Pretty Town, where Uglies like her are not allowed, to spy on the festivities and seek out her friend Peris.

Now here’s what I was saying about tide-me-over goals: Tally’s goal for most of Uglies will be to infiltrate The Smoke and report on their location, so that she can finally achieve her transformation to prettiness. But at the beginning of the novel, we don’t know what any of that means or why that’s so important for her. She’s not ready for that big overarching goal yet. So instead, she has a more immediate goal, and it’s not worldshaking—she just wants to find her friend, reassure herself that he hasn’t forgotten her, and have a little fun. It’s something to keep my interest while the pieces of the major conflict are being set up. It also lets me know about Tally’s character without coming out and telling what kind of kid she is: Tally is a noncomformist, a rule-breaker, and someone who doesn’t quite fit in with the way her society is set up—even if she hasn’t quite figured all this out about herself. Think how much more interesting it is to see her act on these traits, instead of a scene where she’s maybe walking around the dorm thinking about how unhappy she is because she doesn’t quite fit in.

Divergent, by Veronica Roth

It’s a little harder to see what I’m talking about here. In the first scene, Tris is having her hair cut by her mom. In the second scene, she rides a bus to school. So where are the goals?

I say they’re there, but they’re subtle. Note how Tris sneaks a glance at the mirror even though she’s not supposed to. Note the exchange with her mother:

“Are you nervous?”

I stare into my own eyes for a moment. Today is the day of the aptitude test that will show me which of the five factions I belong in. And tomorrow, at the Choosing Ceremony, I will decide on a faction; I will decide the rest of my life; I will decide to stay with my family or abandon them.

“No,” I say. “The tests don’t have to change our choices.”

“Right.” She smiles. “Let’s go eat breakfast.”

There’s quite a bit of subtext here. Do you get the feeling that question was a test? Do you get the feeling Tris doesn’t quite believe her answer? Do you get the feeling that she somehow passed the test anyway?

Right before the scene break a little revelation is snuck in, one that could easily be missed as Tris goes back to being nervous and unsure about her decision in the next scene: On these mornings when my brother makes breakfast, and my father’s hand skims my hair as he reads the newspaper, and my mother hums as she clears the table—it is on these mornings that I feel guiltiest for wanting to leave them.

She does want something. She already knows, deep down inside, that she wants to betray her faction and choose another. But more immediately, she wants to know that she will be okay when she does this. That her brother and father and mother won’t despise her. That she’s not a freak for wanting something else or for being nervous right now. Consider her interaction with her brother in the next scene, where she asks if he’s worried about the test results:

He raises an eyebrow at me. “Are you?”

I could tell him I’ve been worried for weeks about what the aptitude tests will tell me—Abnegation, Candor, Erudite, Amity, or Dauntless?

Instead I smile back and say, “Not really.”

He smiles back. “Well . . . have a good day.”

I walk toward Faction History, chewing on my lower lip. He never answered my question.

Can a character without a goal of her own lie?

I will keep reading this because I know Tris has a secret. She does have a short term goal: to keep her secret, even if it means lying to those closest to her, and even if it means lying to herself. The indications are subtle, but they are there.

Bridge to Terabithia, by Katherine Paterson

I couldn’t ask for a better example of what I’m talking about. When the novel opens, Jess is sneaking outside in the early morning hours to run. Why? Because fifth grade will begin in a matter of days, and he is training to be the fastest runner in the school. An absolutely clear, concrete goal that has little to do with what the story is about. But it’s going to take a while to get into the story proper—Jess must meet Leslie and get to know her. In the meantime, this minor goal gives me something to care about as a reader.

Enclave, by Ann Aguirre

Another post-apocalyptic/dystopian society, full of rules and traditions we don’t know that we need to be immersed in. The story opens on the protagonist’s naming day, and within the first few pages we learn that one or more holocausts have happened since our time, and that humans don’t live very long, and that they live in tiny, almost feral communities. We also get some physical description. Pretty typical worldbuilding stuff right? But the protagonist still has a goal: in her naming ceremony she will be sliced with a razor, and she is focused on not screaming out or otherwise showing weakness. Again, some sign that we are following a protagonist who wants to direct the course of the events she is involved in.

Skellig, by David Almond

This novel opens with another typical situation for YA and MG stories: the kid arriving in the new house. And sure, we spend a couple pages of pretty typical Unhappy-kid-being-shown-around-by-annoying-overenthusiastic-adult. But that’s all: just a couple of pages, and then Michael is exploring the dilapidated garage, venturing into a building he has expressly been forbidden from entering for the time being. Here is a kid who doesn’t wait for the story to come to him, and a kid who doesn’t take “No”—or closed doors—for an answer.

The Mysterious Benedict Society, by Trenton Lee Stewart

This novel opens with Reynie Muldoon in the middle of the series of aptitude tests that will launch him into the larger story. His goal? To do well on the tests, so that he can have some more educational opportunities than his orphanage provides.

Things Not Seen, by Andrew Clements

This is a novel about (*wince*) an adolescent boy who turns invisible. The novel pretty much begins with the inciting incident—Bobby steps out of the shower only to discover that he can’t see himself in the mirror. He goes downstairs to tell his parents what has happened, but they don’t believe him—they think he’s playing a prank. Bang, a goal: he must convince his parents he really has turned invisible.

Ship Breaker, by Paolo Bacigalupi

This highly decorated new post-apocalyptic YA begins with Nailer, the young protagonist, scavenging copper wire and aluminum staples from a beached ship. He is stressed about whether he will make quota—whether he will be judged too big and slow to continue in this job, how soon it will be before the hungry girl who’s eager to take his job away from him will be better suited for it than he is, and how he will survive when he finally does lose this job. I’ve only read a little ways into this book so far, but do you think Bacigalupi has my attention? Absolutely.

How to Ditch Your Fairy, by Justine Larbalestier

Larbalestier is pretty much my favorite YA writer, but I’ll limit myself to just looking at one of her books. In the world of this novel, almost everybody has a “fairy” of some sort. You can’t see them, but each fairy has one particular specialization and you pretty much can’t miss their effects. Maybe you have a always-finding-loose-change fairy, or an all-boys-fall-in-love-with-you fairy, or a never-gets-into-trouble fairy. When the novel opens, Charlie is shopping with her best friend Rochelle, who has a shopping fairy. Her goal is to have some of Rochelle’s good fortune spill over onto her, and to be able to get a good bargain on a “doos outfit.” Mundane stuff, but it’s something. When she is thwarted, I have immediate sympathy for her. And in passing she and her friend slip in a comment about what her main goal is going to be: getting rid of her own fairy, an always-finds-great-parking-spaces fairy.

Okay for Now, by Gary D. Schmidt

I swear Doug Swieteck must be cousins with Chris Westbrook, the protagonist of my novel Vanishing Act. This is the kind of story I was trying to write; only time will tell if I’ve succeeded. Anyway, this novel begins with a bit of background, but in the flashback you still get a goal: Doug is trying to prevent his bully of an older brother from stealing his cap—a personal, autographed gift from Yankee first baseman Joe Pepitone. Read this and tell me you aren’t already rooting for this kid:

He came in at night when I was asleep and whipped my arm up behind my back so high I couldn’t even scream it hurt so bad and he told me to decide if I wanted a broken arm or if I wanted to give him Joe Pepitone’s baseball cap. I decided on the broken arm. Then he stuck his knee in the center of my spine and asked if I wanted a broken back along with the broken arm, and so I told him Joe Pepitone’s cap was in the basement behind the oil furnace.

It wasn’t, but he went downstairs anyway. That’s what a chump he is.

How can  you not love a kid who’d rather take his chances with a broken arm than give up his signed Yankee ballcap?

The Shifter, by Janice Hardy

I think this may be my favorite opening ever:

 Stealing eggs is a lot harder than stealing the whole chicken. With chickens, you just grab a hen, stuff her in a sack, and make your escape. But for eggs, you have to stick your hand under a sleeping chicken. Chickens don’t like this. They wake all spooked and start pecking holes in your arm, or your face, if it’s close. And they squawk something terrible.

The trick is to wake the chicken first, then go for the eggs. I’m embarrassed to say how long it took me to figure this out.

This segues immediately into the protagonist, Nya, getting caught stealing eggs. Why is she stealing? Because she’s poor and hungry. Her goal once she gets caught? To avoid being sent to prison for a couple of eggs.

The Hunger Games, by Suzanne Collins

This novel opens with a fair amount of world-building details, but woven into the exposition, one sentence or so per paragraph over the course of the first four pages, is action to break up the infodump. Katniss gets out of bed. Spots her sister. Heads out of her house. Towards the fence. Oh, and, casual as you please, breaks the law. Katniss sneaks into the forbidden zone beyond the not-quite-electrified fence—offhandedly mentioning that most folks don’t go out there not because it’s illegal but because it’s dangerous—to meet Gale and hunt for food. There’s lots of subtext beneath today’s hunt: it’s reaping day, and Gale talks of running away, while Katniss wonders who would take care of her sister and her mother. But it’s not just talk, just like it’s not just worldbuilding. We’re also getting a look at what kind of character Katniss is—an active one.

The Ghost and the Goth, by Stacey Kade

Another great read you should check out, if you haven’t already heard of it. This book opens with Alona sneaking out of gym class to make a phone call and berate someone. There’s all sorts of things we don’t know at the beginning—who is she calling? Why? But even though we don’t understand the particulars, we can see that Alona’s actively trying to fix something that’s bothering her. She’s got a Situation to unravel.

Too bad for her she gets hit by a bus first.

-o-

Look, I could keep at it all night, but I’ve got to think it will just get tedious, if it hasn’t already. The point is, here are real life examples from successful, talented writers, and their characters don’t wait around for the story to begin before they become active protagonists. From page one or very close to it, they’re take charge people. And when it’s too soon for us to have a clue what the big central conflict is—which is usually—they’re still actively protagging, they’re just focused on some other, temporary goal.

It’s not rocket surgery. Before I write a scene, I jot down what my character’s goal in this scene is. What is my POV character’s preferred outcome, that he or she is going to try to bring about.  And I’m deeply suspicious when the answer is merely, “continued existence.” I don’t begin writing the scene until I have an answer to that question. And if it’s too soon to have the protagonist actively pursue the central goal of the story, then I make sure he or she has a short-term goal to focus on for now.

“But I found a book that doesn’t do this!”

Alright.

There’s all kinds of books out there. Not everybody is trying to write commercial fiction, and I certainly respect that someone else’s goals as a writer may be different. I love fiction that’s literary and smart and uplifting and thought-provoking, but in my own writing I want to be entertaining first, and then accomplish those other things if I’m up to it.

Can a book be entertaining if the protagonist isn’t trying to accomplish anything for the first sixty pages of a novel? Heck, I suppose anything’s possible. My friend and mentor Linnea Sinclair likes to say “Follow no rule off a cliff.” It’s a truism repeated by writers at all ability levels that rules are meant to be broken. But I think too many beginning writers use this as an excuse to uncritically throw advice out the window rather than going through the difficult task of mastering it.

Successful writers don’t break the rules, they transcend them. So if you see a great book that doesn’t do this, ask yourself what that writer is doing that’s making the book work and stay interesting. Ask yourself whether the book succeeds because the protagonist isn’t actively trying to change his or her world, or does it succeed in spite of this?

The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian opens with a lengthy description by the narrator of all his health issues, and all the reasons why folks on the reservation are predisposed to see him as a loser. And then he tells us how poor he is and how much being poor sucks. But what Sherman Alexie has in this novel is an absolutely fantastic voice, and I’ll keep on following this kid around until he finally narrates a scene with a goal in it (page 17: Junior wants to go to the powwow without getting beat up) because he’s so damn compelling even without one.

But I think that kind of opening is the exception, not the norm. And even though it takes Junior a while to show us his goals, eventually he does start protagging in a big way: he makes the difficult decision to attend school off the reservation, knowing it will draw upon him the ire of whites and Indians alike.

I’d lay good money that for every beloved book you can find that doesn’t open with a protagonist who actively wants something, I can find two that do. Wanna take that bet?

Posted in storytelling | 4 Comments

Is your character just along for the ride? On characters and goals and tide-me-over goals (Part 1)

I try to avoid talking about craft too much on this site for a couple of reasons. One is because I don’t want this site to be boring to nonwriters. Another is because of cred: I don’t want some jackass to happen along and slap me down for daring to express my opinion on what makes good writing with a “Who the hell are you to talk?”

I can’t claim any authority, but I have picked up a few things and maybe just formed a few opinions. Take ’em or leave ’em, but if you’re at an earlier point on your journey than I am, you just might find some value here.

Last week in writers’ group, the topic of character goals came up. I maintain that characters are more compelling–arguably only compelling–when they are trying to attain something. I refer to this as whether or not your protagonist is protagging (not that I claim this is original to me). What it comes down to is this: I want to read about a protagonist who is active, not one who is along for the ride. Maybe in some rarified fiction circles you can write about characters who float from event to event but don’t act upon their world, but I don’t think most readers of popular fiction–into which I’m lumping genre and young adult fiction–want to read books like that.

Photo by Mark Rowland (CC BY-ND 2.0)

When I find myself reading something with a central character who is not protagging, I typically get bored. Sometimes, though, I’m forced to admit that exciting stuff is happening, and that’s when the issue of the central character who is just witnessing great events without participating in them pops out most recognizably.

Imagine a scene like this:

Sue is at the bank opening an account when a half dozen masked men come in–a holdup! The security guard tries to wrestle a gun away from one, only to get shot in the head. Behind an overturned chair, a little girl cries for her mommy, but mommy has to ignore her wails because the robbers have ordered everyone to keep still. Suddenly Sue hears sirens–a teller managed to push a silent alarm! The robbers decide they have to get out–but not without taking a hostage. They choose Sue, who follows them without argument. They pile into their van and peel out into traffic just as blue lights appear behind them. Trying to lose the cops, the robber at the wheel takes a corner too fast, and as the rustbucket careens around the turn, it flips onto its side. Immediately police surround the van and disarm the dazed criminals before they can think to create a standoff. Sue is checked for injuries by EMTs, but she has suffered only a sprained wrist, and is able to drive back home.

This scene has a crapload of action, but I maintain that it would be pretty boring if it were written this way, unless perhaps you played it for laughs. It could be pretty exciting from the POV of one of the robbers–heck, it could be a scene right out of The Town. It’s exciting—but short—from the point of view of the security guard or the teller who set off the alarm. But Sue never does anything! She never even tries to do anything! She never even considers doing anything or looks for an opportunity to do anything!

She’s just there.

There may be tension, and yeah, tension is important. But if Sue isn’t trying to change things–even if she fails!–then I say the scene is boring because Sue is boring.

It can be even worse with YA, where we may be left with a sulky and unhappy teen and nothing else:

Albert is at a party at a popular kid’s house. Of course the parents are nowhere in sight, alcohol is flowing freely, and people are half dressed and making out on every chair, sofa, and bed. In the open spaces, couples dance to loud hillbilly music. Not Albert, though. Albert doesn’t have a girlfriend, and he doesn’t like the same kind of music as everyone else in this hick town anyway. Albert is not popular at all, and he hates the popular kids. Albert is only here because Jim, his ride home from the marching band competition, decided to come to the party and brought Albert with him. Albert wanders around, watching people make out and drink. Stupid Jim. Stupid popular kids. Stupid parents. Stupid small town. Stupid life.

After three hours, Jim takes him home.

“You’re home late,” notes his mom.

Albert shrugs.

“Did you have a good time?”

“Whatever.”

Maybe you’ve been to this party yourself. This could have been a really interesting party to read about–from the POV of Jim, or of damn near anybody else there.

Here’s the thing about the angsty kid who is trying to change nothing about his life: Do you want to spend time with this kid?

Does either Sue or Albert sound like someone you’d like to hang out with for six to eight hours?

Sue’s scene could have been interesting if Sue were looking for a way out. Maybe early in the robbery she notices nobody is watching the side door.

She could just walk right out! But does she dare? What if they see her? What if they shoot her?! Have they really not noticed the unguarded exit? Sue steals a glance. They haven’t! Nobody’s looking her way! She’s gonna try–“Hey, someone get that side door,” says a gruff voice behind her. Too late. She waited too long. When they pick Sue as their hostage, maybe she plans to make a break for it the moment she steps out the door, gun or no gun. She doesn’t trust the bad guys not to kill her if they take her with them, so she’s going to take her chances. When they pass through the door, she yanks her arm away from the bad guy and takes off–only to stumble to the sidewalk as her heel breaks. A bad guy drags her to her feet, saying “Nice try.”

Nothing about the outcome of the scene changed, but now Sue was more involved, because she was trying to affect the outcome. Sue is more interesting, and I’d say the scene would be better now.

Maybe Albert wishes he could be one of the kids dancing and making out, but he’s terrified to ask a girl to dance.

What if she says no? Then he spots that one beautiful girl from his Algebra class–Taylor. He follows her around for a bit–does she recognize him? Does she even know who he is? She’s not with anybody. Maybe she’s just as lonely as he is! Maybe she hates country music too! He should ask her if she wants to hang out sometime. He should! But no–he can’t!

Wait—Screw that. Who cares if some girl in this craphole town rejects him? He will ask her. Here’s his chance. He walks up to her.

“Hey Taylor,” he calls out.

“What??”

The stupid music is too loud.

“I said ‘hi,’” he says.

“Oh,” she says. “Hello.” Then her eyes light up. A second later she waves to someone by the front door. “Vanessa!” she calls out, and just like that she is gone.

Shit, he didn’t strike out–it’s worse than that. He took his best shot and she didn’t even notice! It was like he didn’t even exist to her. Didn’t even rise up to the level of a nuisance to be rejected. Stupid damn town! Stupid beautiful girl!

Again, the outcome of the scene doesn’t change. Albert spends the rest of the night moping until Jim takes him home, and he drops the whatever-bomb on Mom. But for one shining moment there, Albert had a Goal. My argument is that this makes the rest of the scene more interesting. It’s more meaningful now. Albert’s still an unhappy, angsty kid, but now he’s an unhappy, angsty kid who occasionally tries to improve his life. This tells me as a reader that it’s worth spending some time with him, because I can reasonably hope to see him, in fumbling fits and starts, finally make a place for himself in this new town and realize it’s not so bad after all. It’s natural as a writer to want to show character growth by taking a character from loser to winner, but as a reader I’m not going to keep reading about a loser unless there is a sign that the winner is in there somewhere, deep down inside.

Maybe your character is going to have a goal as the novel progresses, but it’s just the beginning of your manuscript. The main conflict hasn’t kicked off yet. Rebecca is totally going to thwart the evil werewolf pack, but for now she doesn’t even know werewolves are real! So eventually, yeah, she’s gonna have a great goal. The reader’s just gonna have to wait, right?

Wrong, I say. The reader won’t wait. If you’re not already an author I’ve heard of, if I don’t already trust you to tell me a good story, if a million people haven’t already talked about how amazing you are, then why will I stick through sixty pages of Rebecca starting her new job at the mall and going wherever she’s told and furnishing her new apartment and pretty much just living a humdrum life?

I’ll wait if I see other evidence that Rebecca is worth hanging out with. Show me that Rebecca is a take-charge woman. Show me that she has other goals in her life before the werewolves come and turn everything upside-down. Let me see her pursue them, and let me get a sense for what is important to her, and for what lengths she will go to to get what she wants.

Maybe Rebecca moved to this town to take a job after college, but now that she’s begun, her new boss tells her that the position isn’t what she thought it was. It turns out she’ll be working part-time, and not for the expected $15 an hour, but for $8 an hour instead. What does Rebecca do? Does she go over her boss’s head? Does she start looking for a new job? Does she tearfully call home and ask her Dad to kick in a few hundred dollars until she gets on her feet? Does she stick it out because the boss also happens to be hot and single? Does she go out during her break and smash her boss’s windshield?

The back cover promised me a book about werewolves, dammit, and I’ll only wait so long before you’d better by God show me some werewolves, but while you’re setting things up—giving me that weird noise in the night and those unexplained clawmarks on the door the next day, and that mysterious disappearance—while you’re getting things in place (let’s say forty pages) you can hold my interest with this other stuff. Hopefully, you get me to sympathize with Rebecca in general. Damn she’s had it tough. Just moved to a new town, the big job falls through, her boss is a creep, and on top of that . . . freaking werewolves? Go Rebecca–go kick some werewolf ass.

But I won’t be on Rebecca’s side if you just give me the moving, the job bait-and-switch, and don’t show me a character who damn well intends to do something about it.

I call this a “tide-me-over goal.” I may not have invented the phrase, but if I didn’t, then I’ve forgotten who I stole it from. My apologies if I’m totally ripping someone off. But what I mean is Rebecca has interim goals, until you get far enough into the story to show me Rebecca’s Big Goal.

I care about characters who want things. I care about characters who do things. I care about characters who are propelling their stories, not being dragged behind them.

Continued in part 2: Goals and Tide-Me-Over-Goals: Examples from the Pros

Posted in storytelling | 1 Comment

The case of the semi-reluctant e-reader

Like a lot of nerds, I’m usually an early adopter when it comes to new technology–though I seem have a pretty decent eye for what technology isn’t actually going to make my life easier or better, and I do a good job of sitting those out. I had a smartphone before they were called smartphones, and a tablet pc a half-decade before Apple invented the underpowered-but-beautiful toy tablet. With e-readers I was a bit slow on the uptake, and it wasn’t because I didn’t think they were here to stay. As soon as the good quality e-ink came out, I figured out that an e-reader would make reading more comfortable for me in many ways. But I just couldn’t justify spending a bucket of money (the original Kindle’s list price was indeed measured in buckets) for a device that would enable me to do something I could do quite adequately without it.

I guess I love physical books as much as the next avid reader, but I don’t wax poetic about the smell of paper and glue. Whatevs. And in my increasingly overcrowded house, the idea of storing a thousand books or whatever on an SD card the size of my thumbnail certainly has its appeal. I like to get autographs from authors I admire, but most of my books aren’t autographed, so that’s not a reason to hold on to paper books for me.

But ebooks still cost money, you know? And, bafflingly, they’re not even really cheaper* for requiring no storage or shipping or shelf space. (Really smart people have explained to me why ebooks need to cost more than paperbacks, and I’m not smart enough to say they’re wrong. But I am honest enough to admit that I don’t get it. [But other really smart people have explained to me that paperbacks are actually underpriced, and I’m surprisingly sympathetic to this argument, so maybe it’s not that ebooks need to cost more than paperbacks, it’s that all books need to cost as much as the market will bear if we want to support the editors and authors who make wide distribution of professional quality titles possible.]) Long paragraph short, though: why should I pay a bunch of money for a device that I can use . . . to read??

So when the good e-readers came out, I made a very deliberate attempt to put a price tag on how much the features an e-reader offered were worth to me. $300? No freaking way! $100? Frankly, still no. I’ve got to admit I don’t get what motivates someone to drop that kind of money for a dedicated e-reader. For me, the line was around $40. A small enough sum that I wouldn’t miss it for long, in exchange for increased comfort and convenience.

A month or so ago I finally broke down and bought a Nook, for pretty close to my price. I got it for $50 on Craigslist, and it was one of three Nooks in my area at that price point that weekend. It’s a Nook Classic, and I don’t care one whit that there are shinier, fancier e-readers out there. A black and white screen was, as far as I was concerned, a feature and not a limitation. I wasn’t looking for an Android tablet or whatever else is pushing people up to the high-end models. I already have a computer. I already have toys. Honestly, I didn’t even care about 3G or Wifi, though I’ve got both. I’ve kept my Nook in airplane mode almost continuously since I bought it, to save battery. I download books from the library on my PC and transfer them using the cable, so the connectivity means nothing to me.

PICTURED: The conclusion to the most fun Steampunk series out there.

And you know what? I love this device. It’s like the difference between eating Asian food with crappy restaurant balsa-wood and using your own high quality chopsticks. (And if you don’t know what I mean, go out and get yourself some good wood or lacquer chopsticks post-haste!)

Since I got my Nook, my enjoyment of reading has increased substantially. I can take it easy on my eyes with a bigger typeface. I can find a well-lit spot and not have to shift every time I switch from a left-page to a right-page. It sounds like such a small thing, but as with smooth, splinter-less chopsticks, it makes a huge difference in my comfort, and this means I can keep reading longer. I’ve read more in the last month than in the two or three months before. (And it’s not like I was ever a reluctant reader.)

I wonder if these benefits would be meaningful to younger readers, or if it’s just aging fogeys like me with fading eyes who are likely to care. If you’re a reluctant reader, physical discomfort might not be a major factor in your reluctance, but who’s to say it’s not a factor at all? For all the stats being thrown about about how ebooks are outselling hardcovers and about how Americans are actually reading more these days (believe it or not), I haven’t really seen an analysis of whether or not one phenomenon is having an impact on the other. Are e-readers creating new readers? I have to think it’s at least a possibility. Or at least it will become one as prices continue to tumble.

Stay tuned for part 2, whenever I get around to writing it:
e-readers: saving literacy or cutting out the have-nots?

* Obviously I’m referring to books from major royalty-paying presses.

Posted in bookish life, tech geek | 1 Comment

Banned Books

Last week was Banned Books Week, so to celebrate I read as many banned/challenged books as I could. I spent a couple days sick in bed, so that gave me a little more time.

The first and best book I read last week was Sherman Alexie’s Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian. Now since finishing it I read others that I was less wowed by, but my first reaction was to wonder what on earth it was banned for—being awesome? (In case you’re curious, it was apparently banned in some places for containing the startling revelation that it’s pretty common for fourteen-year-old boys to masturbate. Now you know.)

Like a lot of the books on the ALA’s most-banned list, this one is moving and thought-provoking. It follows Arnold Spirit, Jr. as he struggles to take control of his own learning and future opportunities by leaving a third-rate reservation school and attending the non-Indian school in Reardon, the next town over. Junior’s decision makes him a pariah among his Native American peers because he appears to have betrayed them by attending the “white school.” On the other hand, regardless of what successes he has in Reardon, he will always be Other. And so as we experience a year in Junior’s life, we feel the very real tension between loyalty to one’s roots and loyalty to oneself. Would junior be a better Indian if he accepted a dead-end life, or if he embraced opportunities and subverted racial stereotypes?

Junior’s dilemma felt real and true to me because I often feel caught between two cultures myself. I find it difficult to gain acceptance from Latinos where I live because I too-easily pass for Anglo. Just this year, my sixth period spent the first couple weeks of school questioning me practically ever day: do I really speak Spanish? Well, or just barely? What on earth would the color of my skin have to do with my ability to speak Spanish? But I don’t look Puerto Rican or Mexican, so I can’t possibly be a real Latino, right? (And yet, unlike most transplanted Latinos here, I can actually read and write in my first language. So the answer to “How well do I know Spanish?” is likely, “Better than you.”) On the other hand, Anglos around me often feel it’s safe to share their most virulent anti-Latino notions with me because, evidently, I’m one of the “good ones.” And, you know, I have run into people who’ve had problems with my speaking Spanish in their place of business, or held my background against me in other ways.

I never had to make the difficult choice Junior did, but getting it from both sides–and feeling conflicted at times–certainly rang true to me.

A quick scan of the ALA list shows that challenged books are often our most thought-provoking books for young teens. As if parents fear what would happen if their teens became to independent and questioning in their approach to the world. On the other hand, not every book I read last week impressed me as thoroughly as this one did. In one author’s case, I could see what bothered the would-be banners, but I felt that the book I read was pretty weak all the same. Not ban-worthy, just not recommendable. I guess it just goes to show that being banned is no guarantee of quality either.

I like the idea of banned books week, though. I like that making an effort to read those books basically subverts the intentions of those who would ban them. The more we encourage people to read banned books, the more that banning them will result in more attention and more sales. Eventually, those who would prevent others from reading a particular book will find that having dialogue about their objections (or letting a book stay obscure) will work better than trying to decide what other people should be able to read. Win-win.

(Note that I’m not equating parents making decisions for their own children with book-banning. Book-banning is when you try to control what other people’s kids can read, by having books pulled from classes and from the library. I don’t think prohibiting your kids from reading a book is generally effective or wise when it comes to teenagers, but it’s not the same thing.)

Posted in books you might enjoy, rants, the latino thing | Leave a comment

Read This Now!

From Geek & Poke, by Oliver Widder (CC BY-SA 3.0)

I’m bad at prioritizing.

It took me many years to figure this out. I didn’t even realize there was a trick to prioritizing until a year or two ago, which just goes to show how bad I am at it. I just figured, make a list, mental or otherwise, of the things I need to do, and then number them in order of importance. Then I could never figure out why I kept finding myself in trouble for not accomplishing something or other.

A couple years or so ago I finally realized there were other variables besides importance. There’s urgency, for one: how soon is something due? That might make it necessary complete one task ahead of another that is technically more important. And then there’s how likely it is that someone will check on it. Can a task that nobody checks on be more important than one that will have oversight? I think so. Depending on how you look at it, I’m either pretty scrupulous or pretty obsessive/compulsive. And so some things are just more important for me to do, even if I know nobody else will ever know about it. I’ll know.

But even recognizing that there are other variables doesn’t make me better at juggling them. I mean there are obvious cases, sure, but how do I balance something very important with something less important but more urgent?

A couple of years ago, I came up with a successful but unhealthy solution: when in doubt, I’ll just work harder. Every time I got called to the table for something I failed to accomplish, I resolved that that particular issue wouldn’t trip me up again. When I can’t decide which of two tasks is more important, I stay up later, I sacrifice my own goals or recreation, and I get ’em both done. It has led to me being less likely to get called out for failing to accomplish something, but it’s also lead to me giving up a lot–arguably more than I should have to.

I think a big problem of mine is that I can’t stand to fail. I’d rather burn myself totally out than knowingly allow myself to accomplish less than my best. But, paradoxically, that pressure may make me more likely to fail, because I spread myself to thin and dampen my enthusiasm.

Anyway, this isn’t really going anywhere. It’s just random musing. A lot of times I feel like I should only blog about something if I can tie it up in a neat bow, and maybe find a cool public domain picture to boot, and often that pressure keeps me from blogging at all.

Maybe you’ve got some insight into how to resolve conflicting priorities? Is it easier for you than it is for me?

Posted in blargety-blog | 2 Comments

However do you want me, however do you need me?

Photo by Wirawat Lian-udom (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

Over the last week-plus, summer ended and we went back to reality here at Casa Iriarte. I’ve been so swamped with things! to get done! immediately! that I haven’t had a chance to come up for air until tonight. Hopefully now things will calm down and I’ll have the chance to reclaim some bits of my life for my own pursuits.

Every year is full of its challenges and things that don’t go exactly right, but from my perspective this has been one of the smoothest school openings I can remember. We got our rosters on the first day of preplanning, and our textbooks within the first couple days. I well remember years where we didn’t get rosters until the morning school began, and where we went two or three weeks into the year without being able to give out books. I was able to pick up the technology I use within the first day or so, and got immediate help on my first technical snafu–a dead tablet battery–as well. I was even able to schedule time in the computer lab on the very second day of school, when last year it was just about impossible to come by all year.

The good support I got from above and all around made it possible for me to be as organized as possible when it came to my own tasks. I was able to get all my student files set up well ahead of the first day–that proves impossible more often than not–and also go through a lot of the pre-year preparation rituals that help me feel ready to be successful. I can definitely remember years when I’ve been a lot less ready to go at the beginning of the year–most of them, in fact.

During preplanning I also got the chance to go to the open house at my kids’ school and meet their teachers and get their supply lists. I swear, I have a hard time believing that some of the teachers out there have children of their own going to school. I spent at least a hundred and fifty bucks getting just the minimum all their teachers asked for, and keeping an eye out for sales at that. And my favorite bit was the enormous binders everybody seemed to want. Pro tip: kids can’t generally fit two 1½-inch binders in their backpacks and still have room for anything else. (1½ inches doesn’t sound that big, but next time you’re in Staples go see what I’m talking about; that just describes the rings, not the whole thing.)

And then the kids arrived. As a teacher, I’m doubly blessed. I teach high level classes filled with motivated kids who are generally very nice. I also teach a lot of my own lead-up classes, so I get to know a lot of my kids for several years. Still, there are always new faces to learn, and it’s a bit unnerving to face class after class with unfamiliar faces, and the unwritten story they represent. What kind of year will this be?

Some summers are better for recharging your motivation than others, and this one was a good one. I had some successes in my non-teaching life, some much-needed and much-appreciated affirmations of what I do in the classroom, and some simple time away. So I’m in a good place going into this year, but as I mentioned in another post, some failures are inevitable, and at the beginning of the year, I don’t know where my struggles will be. Every day is a delicate guessing game of did I expect too much? Review to little? Talk too long? Come across too bombastic? Confront when I should have cajoled? It can take as little as one mistake to close a door, and when you realize you’ve lost a kid, you can spend the rest of the year wondering what different move would have changed things. For now, though, all those doors seem open; I can keep my fingers crossed and hope I can find a way to be all things to all my students.

The last two years have been good ones for me, but they have been extremely stressful ones just the same. It feels like nationwide more and more is being added to teachers’ plates while nothing is taken off and no more compensation is offered, and pundits nationwide are laying a host of failures at our feet. I’ve never worked harder than I have for the last two years, and I spent both of them feeling like I was barely accomplishing the things I was expected to. (A big part of that stress has to do with LFS lesson plans, but that’s a topic that really deserves its own post some day.)

This week began very stressful again, but midweek I felt that stress lift in a way I haven’t experienced in a very long time, and I began to feel optimistic that the foundation my colleagues and I had laid over the past couple of years was bearing fruit. We’ve been working at being more collaborative, which can be good or bad. Collaboration is only as good as you think your colleagues are, but I’m lucky to have some great ones. So I found myself going home at the end of the day having all but cleared my to-do list. For comparison’s sake, that to-do list was never empty last year. Never. I can’t tell you how light I felt riding home, feeling like I’d done my work, and now I could focus on myself for a bit. I’d like to think that having more time to find satisfaction in my non-teaching life can only serve to make me a better teacher.

Hopefully, that sense of well-being will still be around once piles of student work are coming in, and there are e-mails and phone calls to return, and meetings to attend, and so forth.

Posted in teaching | Leave a comment